Search for: "CARRINGTON v. SULLIVAN"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am
As there is no evidence suggesting that Grover & Fensterstock was aware of or part of Lauria’s fraudulent scheme, none of the exceptions to the privity requirement are applicable here (see Mauro v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 116 AD3d 930, 933 [2d Dept 2014]; Chemical Bank v Bowers, 228 AD2d 407, 408 [2d Dept 1996]; see also Hinnant v Carrington Mtge. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Sullivan & A. [read post]